I believe in “Google” schools. I want more schools to be “Google” schools. When I think of a “Google” school, I am thinking beyond the world of Apps for Education. Rather, I want my school and the schools of my children, to be filled with educators who would be equally at home working at Google.
It is no surprise that Google often ranks at the top of innovative companies in the world. It also frequently tops the list of companies that most college graduates want to work for. Yes, the compensation that these top companies offer is undoubtedly attractive. In this respect, the world of education can’t and shouldn’t try to compete. But there are some things that Google considers when hiring that we in education should try to emulate.
The first is “smarts”. Being smart is important at Google just like it is in education and many other professions. But at Google, being smart is not enough. Intellectual curiosity is considered even more important and is something they look for when hiring. Think about it in the context of education. The phrase “Life long learners” commonly appears in the Mission and Vision Statements of schools around the world. Yet how often is the idea of intellectual curiosity factored into hiring?
Quite naturally, Google wants every person they hire to be good at what they do – be it coding, networking, marketing, or finance. Schools are no different. Kindergarten teachers need to be as good at what they do as a Middle School drama, or an IB Calculus teacher. But a clear difference lies in the fact that Google expects everyone to be a leader. They actively seek out people who will take control of a situation instead of waiting to be lead. According to Tony Wagner, Google has a bias towards action. They want their employees to always be asking the important question, “How can I make things better?” In other words, If you see something is broken … fix it!
I like the Google mindset because it is what I think we need more of in schools. You can never have too many people working together to make the world a better place. I think at its core, schools need to be incubators of intellectual curiosity, places where everyone is teaching and everyone is learning. Schools benefit by being populated by professionals who lead without necessarily having the positional power. I guess that is why I am fascinated by the work of Dana Watt’s and her research into “Disruptive Leadership in the International Schools”.